Religious dialogue as a peace building tool between India and Pakistan : the Ulema as peace builders
Loading...
Authors
Kasbekar, Durgesh
Issue Date
2018-02-15
Type
Thesis
Language
Subject
International Relations , Peace Building , Religion , Religious Dialogue , Religious Peace Building , Ulema
Alternative Title
Abstract
Religion played a critical role in the creation of the State of Pakistan. However, religious
dialogue has never been considered as a means of peace building between India and Pakistan.
This dissertation probes the rationale and possibility of religious dialogue as a peace-building
tool between the two countries. It identifies the ulema as cross-border actors who are best suited
to communicate on this subject and probes the nature of religious dialogue between Indian and
Pakistani ulema on the topic of peaceful coexistence between Hindus and Muslims.
Ethnographic research of the Indian ulema reveals that the community is socially, politically, and
ideologically fragmented. Although there has been no interreligious dialogue between the ulema
of the two countries, they jointly participated in two international peace conferences in India.
Also, as nonstate religious actors, the Indian ulema have developed a syncretic culture with the
Hindu community and can initiate religious dialogue with their Pakistani counterparts. This
offers scope for religious peace building between the two countries, shifting the dialogue from an
India–Pakistan framework to a Hindu–Muslim framework. The religion in international relations
theory, which identifies religion as the blind spot in international relations, lends support to such
a dialogue. Strongly supported by the international relations theories of neoliberalism and
constructivism, religious peace building offers opportunity for hope and experimentation. By
aiming to reduce the trust deficit associated with a Hindu–Muslim civilizational cleavage,
religious peace building fills a gap in the literature on India–Pakistan relations. However, the
feasibility of religious dialogue, which looks weak, completely hinges on the ulema’s capacity to
rise above preoccupations, personal ambitions, and disunity.