Plan Canada - Vol 42 No 3 (2002)

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/10613/5507

Browse

Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 5 of 12
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Plan Canada - Volume 42, Number 3 (July-August-September 2002)
    (Canadian Institute of Planners, 2002)
    The CIP/PIBC annual conference, "2002: Making Waves," attracted some 550 planners from across Canada to its numerous workshops, presentations and social activities. The conference program was built around five sub-themes: Nature in the City; Land Use and Transportation; New Media and Economic Transitions; City Soul; and Community Sustainability. Mobile workshops explored such locations as Granville Island, False Creek, Maple Ridge and Bowen Island, to name but a few.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Contents
    (Canadian Institute of Planners, 2002)
    Table of contents for Plan Canada - Volume 42, Number 3 (July, August, September 2002).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Making waves in 2002
    (Canadian Institute of Planners, 2002) Sholberg, Chris
    It is my pleasure to present this issue of Plan Canada, as a sampling of the "2002: Making Waves" conference held May 26-29 in Burnaby, B.C. by the Canadian Institute of Planners and the Planning Institute of British Columbia.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Making waves, making connections, making change
    (Canadian Institute of Planners, 2002) Nothstein, Raymond; Hudema, Blake
    Funny things can happen after an evening of cocktails and socializing: the next day you may realize that you've volunteered to organize and run a major planning conference. This is what happened to us three years ago, and now that we've emerged from a process that seemed like a blur, we're ecstatic to report that the "2002: Making Waves" conference was a success on all fronts.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The resurgence of Canadian cities
    (Canadian Institute of Planners, 2002) Axworthy, Lloyd
    We all like comeback stories about aging athletes, forgotten matinee idols, even retired politicians. There is something inspiring about taking a second chance. This seemed like a good theme for addressing a group of Canadian planners. I want to ask planners what happened to the Canadian city: Who did it in? What kind of work and thinking is necessary to bring it back to life?